Alibaba vs Luma

Wan 3.0 vs Ray3.2

Two models line by line: prices from the official rates this site has confirmed, capabilities from the vendor's own page. Generation quality is not compared — we have no same-prompt samples we can publish, so anything said about it would be a guess.

The short answer

200 seconds of generation a month: 20 videos × 5 seconds each × 2 attempts on average.

At this volume Wan 3.0 costs less: $10 a month through Replicate, against $12 for Ray3.2 through Luma API.
Channels this site can price: 21 for Wan 3.0, 20 for Ray3.2.

Line by line

Item	Wan 3.0Alibaba	Ray3.2Luma
Basics
Developer	Alibaba	Luma
Status	Active	Active
Last confirmed	Sep 18, 2026	Sep 17, 2026
At your usage
Cheapest per month	$10/mo Replicate · Pay as you go	approx.$12/mo Luma API · Pay as you go
Pricing
Lowest subscription cost per second	$0.043/s Higgsfield · 480p	$0.008/s Luma · Draft
Lowest API price per second	$0.025/s Replicate · 480p · Not specified	approx.$0.030/s Luma API · 540p · Not specified
Official specs
Clip length	2–30 seconds	Not stated
What it can do	Text to video, Image to video, First/last frame, Reference to video	Not stated
Highest resolution	1080p	Not stated
Audio	Generates its own audio	Not stated
Specs (from the price lists)
Resolution	480p · 720p · 1080p	Draft · 540p · 720p · 1080p
Audio	Not stated in the price lists	No audio
Billing	Per second, Per 5s clip	Per 5s clip, Per 10s clip
Where to buy
Subscription tools	Pika, Krea, Higgsfield	Luma
With an exact published rate	Pika, Higgsfield	Luma
API	Runway API, fal, Replicate, Alibaba Cloud Bailian, Alibaba Cloud Model Studio	Luma API, Replicate
Source
Official page	Official source page	Official source page

The "at your usage" row uses this site's default volume; with your own numbers the answer can change. Compare at your own usage ↗

Where Wan 3.0 is cheapest Where Ray3.2 is cheapest